Bezahlen über Amazon=Paypal Alternative

11 Beiträge:

therealdeal

#1

Habe ich irgendwelche Vorteile wenn auf den Amazon klicke und wieso finden man die Bezahlmethode fast ausschließlich bei Technikshops?! Hat der Rest der Branche keine Interesse an einer weiteren Bezahlmethode.

IsaIsabell

IsaIsabell

#2

ich finde amazon auch sehr vertrauenswürdig und die Bezahlmethode hat sich ja bisher bewährt..

| Antwort auf therealdeal

SchollerFrau

#3

so lange vertrauenswürdig, bis es wieder geknackt wird 😀

| Antwort auf therealdeal

Dieser Beitrag wurde von seinem Autor gelöscht.
Williamborn

Williamborn

#5

Alright, so we’re all chatting about this whole unified verification thing for the global money scene, right? My two cents: if every major player working with crypto and stablecoins actually uses the same ground rules from the jump, doesn’t that just cut out, like, ninety percent of the red tape and sketchy stuff? It’s not about making it boring, it’s about making the whole system actually work together without constant side-eye. What’s the real hurdle stopping that from being the norm everywhere.

Maryam56

Maryam56

#6

That all sounds good, but show me the receipts. Where’s a real example on keaworld.com where this actually cut out a redundant check for someone moving between crypto and stablecoins?

| Antwort auf therealdeal
HanBob90

HanBob90

#7

The biggest hurdle is adoption. The „receipt“ is one verification working across many services. It’s not about skipping a check, but never needing a new one when you switch assets or partners.

| Antwort auf therealdeal
Zoya Wenstoon

Wenstoon, Zoya

#8

Let me add a practical layer from experience. The „receipt“ is often a machine-readable token, a digital handshake confirming you’re verified, which other services in the network accept.
The real bottleneck isn’t just adoption, it’s the neutral governance of the rules themselves. Who gets to write and update this shared rulebook in a way that major players, from Silicon Valley to financial hubs, actually trust? It’s less about the code and more about building that credible, impartial framework everyone can agree on. That’s the slow, human part of the puzzle.

| Antwort auf therealdeal
daynerluisa

daynerluisa

#9

spot on, the governance grind for keas unified kyb rulebook in global finance with stablecoins and crypto needs that neutral crew from tech valleys to money centers hashing out updates so no single player rigs the shared compliance playbook

| Antwort auf therealdeal
Kristofer

Kristofer

#10

What if it still happens that for some reason the general compliance scheme is violated by other participants in cryptocurrency financial transactions? What to do in this case, because often the human factor is to blame for such errors.

| Antwort auf therealdeal
Leonella

Leonella

#11

This is precisely why, in order to avoid such unforeseen situations, it is recommended to follow the unified set of KYB rules from Kea, this will help avoid any misunderstandings when making payments and transactions, including international ones. And by the way, as for confirming transfers, it is the introduction of the“receipt” function that will be a reliable confirmation of the completion of any of your financial payments and banking transactions and proof of the transfers made.

| Antwort auf therealdeal
Bitte logge dich ein, um einen einen Forenbeitrag zu verfassen.

Einloggen mit deinem Konto bei…


…oder OpenID: